Civil Divorce should be for the civil courts

The proposed bill by MKs Zahava Gal-On and Merav Michaeli on the subject of permitting civil divorce was discussed and voted down several days ago by the Ministerial Committee on Legislative Matters. The bill was based on the premise that the Court for Family Affairs would have the authority to discuss the marriage permit of a couple with the same religion who had chosen to marry in a civil wedding abroad. The current legal situation does not allow this

Today, a Jewish couple that decides to travel overseas to get married in a civil wedding are subject to the jurisdiction of the Rabbinical Court in all matters of divorce, even though they chose not to get married by the rabbinical establishment in Israel.

The bill seeking to change the situation in these affairs and allow such couples who married abroad to have their marriage sanctioned by the Court for Family Affairs a civil court. It is important to know that the authority to sanction the marriage of same sex couples who married abroad in a civil wedding has been granted to the court for Family Affairs because the Rabbinical Court ruled that it is not within the scope of its authority. If so then this is clear discrimination between same sex couples and heterosexual couples on everything regarding matters sanctioning their marriage.

MKs Gal-On and Michaeli think that stress should be placed on human rights on everything regarding freedom of religion and conscience and that there is no point in forcing the authority of the Rabbinical Court in discussing the divorce of couples who were married in a civil ceremony overseas. It was also proposed as part of the bill that the Rabbinical Court would be given sole authority to discuss marriage and divorce matters only if the wedding was conducted according to religious law.

As known, in the State of Israel civil marriage has not yet been recognized and anyone who desires to get married in Israel and register as married at the interior Ministry must get married in a religious wedding. There are those who think that forcing religious marriage on the State's citizens is a terrible thing and it is even worse that religious divorce is forced upon those who choose to get married in a civil ceremony abroad.

Will subjecting the couple that married in a civil ceremony abroad to the authority of the Rabbinical Court in Israel result in the unnecessary perpetuation of legal procedures and create an opening for extortion by one of the parties of the other? It is important to remember that in many cases divorce proceedings are conducted simultaneously between couples in two courts. There is no doubt that the situation leads to protracted conduct of a case, duplication of discussions, high court costs and major suffering by all those involved in the matter.

It would seem that granting the possibility of a choice to the appropriate court would be the correct thing. The matter requires a change in legislation that would allow turning to the Rabbinical Court in divorce proceedings or alternatively to civil proceedings in the Court for Family affairs. In that way it would be possible to prevent the Rabbinical Court from forcing its authority on the divorce matters of those who chose to get married in civil ceremony rather than according to religious law.

The author is the Founder of Matat Plesner Law Firm.

Cyber Wisdom

As we enter the second decade of the Cyber Era, we can state that the challenges we face are beyond any imagination.

Construction of new plants - EPC versus EPCM

The approach which had previously dominated the construction of new factories was to have complete separation between design and execution. This is known as EPCM – Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management.

ayelet shaked bayit yehudi Israeli law takes major step forward

Israel has taken a major step forward in allowing foreigners to do business in Israel.

Amit Vardy, CEO Leader Capital Market Dun's 100 ranks Leader as Israel's top underwriters

Leader Underwriters rose from fourth place in 2014 displacing IBI from the top spot.

Ilan Cohn and Zeev Pearl Pearl Cohen takes over as Israel's top patent attorneys

The 2015 "Globes" Dun's 100 patent attorney rankings show Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz has become the country's largest firm.

Benjamin Netanyahu, Yair Lapid  picture:Yitzhar 0% VAT - 100% ego

Israel's citizens are again waking up to a new reality.

Major changes in child support rulings

Changing reality requires new rulings that are equal and fair.

Urban Renewal Authority - Second chance for change

The establishment of the government's Urban Renewal Authority brings new opportunities.

Renting an apartment? Income tax won't exactly help

Families renting a larger home and renting out their smaller home should get a tax break.

Child support a revolution!

Joint custody is now the default option and child support is calculated accordingly.

Moshe Asher Opportunity for new start with Israel Tax Authority

The "voluntary disclosure" procedure offers a chance to settle past tax debts without fear of criminal proceedings.

laptop, computer, work When an employee brings equipment from home

Can employees use their own telephone or computer?

What is the connection between divorce and circumcision?

A divorce case currently being conducted in various courts raises questions about the authority of the Rabbinical Court to deal with subjects that are not bound by their very nature to the divorce suit. Does the Rabbinical Court have the authority to compel a Jewish citizen in Israel to circumcise his son against his will? How far will the Rabbinical Court expand its authority?

Absence of positive discrimination in the workplace verges on discrimination

The important decision by the High Court of Justice to integrate people with disabilities into the job market sets that the absence of positive preference in the work place and by the same measure not promoting an employee because he cannot fill a full time role due to his disabilities is discrimination.

Civil Divorce should be for the civil courts

The proposed bill by MKs Zahava Gal-On and Merav Michaeli on the subject of permitting civil divorce was discussed and voted down several days ago by the Ministerial Committee on Legislative Matters. The bill was based on the premise that the Court for Family Affairs would have the authority to discuss the marriage permit of a couple with the same religion who had chosen to marry in a civil wedding abroad. The current legal situation does not allow this

Twitter Facebook Linkedin RSS Newsletters גלובס Israel Business Conference 2018