Why we need reasonableness

The Supreme Court, Jerusalem  credit: Seth Aronstam/Shutterstock
The Supreme Court, Jerusalem credit: Seth Aronstam/Shutterstock

The reasonableness standard is an essential tool in judicial oversight of government; it can be modified, but we abolish it at our peril, argues international lawyer Trevor Asserson.

"…whoever has judicial authority… will not discuss the reasonableness of a decision of the government, of the prime minister or of another minister…" (Amendment to Basic Law: The Judiciary).

It is a remarkable thing that a government passes a law authorizing it to behave unreasonably, as Israel’s government is now doing, and thinks this is reasonable. It is worth considering how ‘reasonableness’ works.

Imagine a public demonstration. The minister - who sacked the police chief to appoint his friend in his stead - orders the police chief to respond firmly because of an imminent ‘danger to public order’. The demonstration is broken up; the demonstrators injured and imprisoned.

The demonstration consisted of five young girls, peacefully displaying placards demanding better school food.

The suppression of this demonstration, if unchallenged, has a chilling effect on all peaceful demonstrators, thus undermining the exercise of this fundamental right. Look for instance at Hong Kong where today a lone individual holding up a blank piece of paper will be arrested for public order offences.

But how does the court handle the minister’s order to the police chief. There was no discrimination; it is within police authority to break up demonstrations; he did not consider irrelevant information. The best and often only tool of control is ‘reasonableness’. If the minister’s fear of a ‘danger to public order’ is irrational, then his decision should be set aside. The chief of police, who showed no independent judgment, should suffer a career limiting court reprimand.

The court thus creates a virtuous circle, encouraging good decision making and promoting good government.

But if the decision is not set aside, the process reverses. The minister’s irrational judgment, and the policeman’s unthinking obedience, are encouraged. A vicious circle promotes bad government. Victims of bad government fail to bring claims because there is no point. Rights are eroded, and bad decision making becomes the norm. The road is open to a failed state.

Yet in our brave new Israel, the policeman will hide behind his minister, who decided that danger to public order existed. Was such a view reasonable? It looks improbable, but the court cannot even ask the question. So the arrests remain valid and the young old girls languish in prison.

All fields of government activity are at risk: zoning; health; traffic control; transport, etc. Remove the judicial tool of ‘reasonableness’ and you buy a ticket to the unrestrained government of Russia, China or Iran.

Some pro-reform arguments have merit. The Israeli court probably applies ‘reasonableness’ too freely, substituting its views for that of the original decision maker. But this can easily be cured.

In the widely followed English legal system a government decision can be set aside only where it is ‘so unreasonable that no reasonable person could have made it’, i.e., it was irrational. This is a far higher hurdle than simply preferring one course over another.

It would be irrational to put a convicted paedophile in charge of education; a mafia drug baron in charge of drug distribution in the health service; a convicted fraudster in charge of finance; or a fox in charge of the hen-house.

Similarly it would be irrational for a government minister to dismiss senior officials merely to replace them with an under-skilled close friend or relative, or to award contracts to other equally under-skilled friends or relatives. However improbable these scenarios, liberal society needs a tool to prevent them. ‘Reasonableness’ is that tool.

The government argues that, even with this tool removed, the courts will retain many other judicial tools. This argument amounts to saying the reforms will make no difference - in which case why pass them? But the argument lacks logic. It is true that the judges will be left with a saw, a drill and a screwdriver - but they will no longer have a hammer. When you need a hammer, a screwdriver falls short. That is why all liberal societies have ‘reasonableness’ as a central tool in their judicial tool-box.

Another argument - that the reforms do not threaten Israel’s democratic architecture - is of course correct. But this is a cheap point. ‘Demokratia’ is shorthand for ‘an open liberal society’. Remove the central tool of restraint on government conduct and ‘open liberal society’ is fatally eroded.

A further argument - that the democratically elected government has the right to do what it wishes, since it has the mandate - is simply wrong. Firstly, the electorate was ignorant of the detail of the judicial reform when it voted. Secondly, winning an election does not authorise majoritarian dictatorship. Fundamental freedoms from abuse, discrimination and unfairness are baked into liberal society.

These values might be protected in a constitution; in basic laws; or by mere convention. They are also protected by checks and balances: a second chamber; a president; and always the courts. But destroy the checks and balances, and liberal society starts to ebb away. The only brake on Israeli government lies with the judiciary. That control might need careful amendment. It should not be disarmed and made toothless.

Dictators start by attacking the independence of the judiciary. Putin in Russia, Xi in China, Orban in Hungary, have all taken this path. Israel should not follow.

The government argument that restraints can be legislated is superficially attractive, but illusory. Legislation is a clumsy and slow process. The world is only now fumbling its way towards legislative restraints for social media, while regulation of AI is still a distant dream. Judges around the world have developed flexible all-purpose tools, such as ‘reasonableness’, to deal with these gaps in legislation.

Pro-reformers identify a real need for judicial reform. Anti-reformers identify real risks in the proposed reforms. Each should recognise and respect the other. Workable solutions, presently blocked by politics and egos, are within our grasp; they should be seized. 

Trevor Asserson is a UK litigation lawyer and founder of Israel’s largest international law firm. His views are personal and do not necessarily represent those of his colleagues, or of "Globes".

Published by Globes, Israel business news - en.globes.co.il - on July 24, 2023.

© Copyright of Globes Publisher Itonut (1983) Ltd., 2023.

The Supreme Court, Jerusalem  credit: Seth Aronstam/Shutterstock
The Supreme Court, Jerusalem credit: Seth Aronstam/Shutterstock
Rooftop solar panels credit: Shutterstock Does it pay for homes to install rooftop solar panels?

As the Israeli government steps up efforts to encourage homeowners to produce their own electricity from rooftop panels, "Globes" investigates the advantages and pitfalls.

Dop Elbit banner at London's Allianz HQ credit: Reuters PA Images Violence against Israeli defense cos in UK escalates

"The Sunday Times" has investigated Palestine Action, a radical left-wing group that targets Israeli defense companies, their subsidiaries, and corporations and banks with any connection to Israel.

UnitedHealth founder Richard Burke credit: Ken Easley UnitedHealth founder: US health system is broken

In an exclusive interview Richard Burke talks about the murder of the company's CEO, Donald Trump, his love for Israel, and investment in Israeli startup Korro AI.

Left to right: Karin Goldberg, Einav Laser, Dr. Arseniy Lobov, Dr. Paola Antonello, Dr. Merav Shmueli, and Prof. Yifat Merbl (center in black)  credit: Weizmann Institute Israeli scientists' discovery could lead to new antibiotics

Prof. Yifat Merbl of the Weizmann Institute and her team have found a natural source of anti-microbial substances in the "garbage can" of human cells.

Peter Kash credit: personal photograph Peter Kash confident about cancer cure breakthrough

In Israel for IATI's MIXiii International Life Science and Health-Tech week, the US investor talks about his life science portfolio and the opportunities Israel must seize.

Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump visit Kfar Aza, December 2023   credit:  Noam Moskowitz, Knesset Spokesperson's Office Jared Kushner builds a Middle East business empire

Now the largest shareholder in Israeli financial group The Phoenix Holdings, Kushner, who was instrumental in forging the Abraham Accords, has financial ties spanning regional friends and foes.

Nir Zuk credit: Inbal Marmari Nir Zuk fears mass exodus of talent from Israel

Despite his concerns, the Israeli tech billionaire, who founded Palo Alto Networks, today worth $125 billion, remains optimistic and talks about his investments in Air Haifa, digital bank Esh, and fintech startup Finq.

Family businesses credit Shutterstock Why are family businesses more immune to crises?

Devin DeCiantis and Ivan Lansberg of international family business consulting firm LGA, address this issue in their recently published book "The Enduring Enterprise."

Council workers removed antisemitic slurs graffitied onto garage doors and cars in Sydney credit: Reuters/Biance De MarchiI Trouble in Australian Jewish paradise

Australian Jewish community leaders explain the unnerving spate of anti-Semitic incidents in a country so long seen as a safe refuge.

AI credit: Shutterstock As AI kicks in graduates struggle to find tech jobs

Tech companies in Israel have cut back on hiring juniors, as AI is already quicker, cheaper and more accurate in writing code, than computer science graduates.

Ben Gurion airport credit: Tali Bogdanovsky War tensions accelerate Israel's Arab brain drain

Since October 7th, discrimination and alienation are driving more and more Israeli Arabs to emigrate. "Globes" talks to some who have decided to leave.

Intel plant in Kiryat Gat credit:  Intel Intel Israel fate unclear amid TSMC, Broadcom sale talks

"Globes" considers the options for Intel Israel's 9,500 employees if the ailing chip giant is broken up and sold.

BIG Glilot credit: Tel Aviv online BIG Glilot - Israel's biggest shopping center set to open

The shopping center will send shockwaves throughout the retail sector in Tel Aviv and the Sharon region and could put some of the area's malls out of business.

Assaf Rappaport, Gil Shwed and Nadav Zafrir Can Check Point shake off its conservative ways?

The strategic partnership with Wiz is the first major decision by CEO Nadav Zafrir, after 30 years of Gil Shwed's cautious management.

Fintech Photo: Shutterstock Israeli fintech firm valuations plunge despite strong growth

"Globes" examines why Rapyd, Melio and eToro have halved their valuations, even though revenue and profitability are growing.

ERLOS plant in Germany credit: Peter Fenes EV battery recycling plant to open in Israel

Car importer Colmobil is leading the consortium building the plant based on German technology.

Twitter Facebook Linkedin RSS Newsletters גלובס Israel Business Conference 2018