The Abraham Accords one year on - who's next?

Dr. Norman Bailey

Following the general success of the agreements signed with Israel by four Arab countries a year ago, there are one or two good candidates to follow suit.

It is a pleasure to be writing about something positive that is happening in the world for a change. And the Abraham Accords are certainly a very positive development. How have they worked out so far and what are the prospects in the near future?

So far, four Arab countries have signed agreements with Israel, collectively nicknamed the Abraham Accords. (This is in addition to the longstanding agreements with Egypt and Jordan.) Of the four, Sudan's accord is on hold due to the fact that shortly after signing, Sudan suffered a coup d'état, the implications of which have still not been sorted out. This doesn't matter much, because Sudan has little influence with the other Arab countries

The UAE and Bahrain have been enthusiastically and successfully following up on their agreements with Israel.

Perhaps the most encouraging is the agreement with Morocco, which is the only country that has not only made economic, commercial and technological agreements with Israel but a defense agreement as well, pledging to exchange defense-related information, technology and equipment.

What is the likelihood that the accords will be expanded to include other Arab countries in the Middle East and North Africa? I have divided the countries involved into four categories: First, those Arab states that will under no circumstances enter into an Abraham Accord with Israel for the time being: namely Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen. All of those countries are satellites of or under the overriding influence of Iran.

Secondly are the unlikely countries--Kuwait, Qatar and Algeria. Kuwait and Algeria are virulently anti-Israel and antisemitic in their foreign policies. Qatar for years has been amazingly successful in balancing off all the relevant actors while placating Iran, with which it shares the gas field which is the source of its wealth, through supporting terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah and Hamas.

I classify the possible countries as Libya and Saudi Arabia. Two of the candidates in the pending presidential election in Libya have been making pro-Israel noises. One of them, Gen. Halfter, is likely to win if the elections are fair. Saudi Arabia is likely to join after the king passes away and the crown prince takes over, since he is entirely dedicated to turning Saudi Arabia into a world-class hi-tech center. He didn't establish his new tech city in the northwest corner of Saudi Arabia, a stone's throw from Israel, for nothing.

Finally, those almost certain to join, Oman and Tunisia. Oman was on the verge of acceding to the accords when the sultan passed away. There was confusion as to his successor, since he had no direct heir, and the person who eventually succeeded him is less pro-Israel than the deceased sultan was. Nevertheless, with the examples of the UAE and Bahrain, I think Oman will join before long. Once Tunisia sorts out its political crisis, and in view of the successes of its fellow North African country, Morocco, that nascent democracy is likely to sign on.

What are the implications of all this for the region and the entire Muslim world? In the first place, the example is vitally important. It can be done, the sky didn't fall, the members are reaping important benefits, and the heck with the Palestinians. Once the Saudis, the very center of the religion of Islam, sign on, this will have an enormous effect on the rest of the Muslim world, especially those countries which practice a moderate form of Islam.

In short, the Abraham Accords are, indeed, of great and greatly positive importance. Very good news in a world with a shortage of such news.

Dr. Norman Bailey is professor of Economic Statecraft at the Galilee International Management Institute, and adjunct professor at the Institute of World Politics, Washington DC. Dr. Bailey was a senior staff member of the National Security Council during the Reagan administration and of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence during the George W. Bush administration.  

Published by Globes, Israel business news - en.globes.co.il - on December 21, 2021.

© Copyright of Globes Publisher Itonut (1983) Ltd., 2021.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli Senseless

When even common courtesy is condemned by political partisans, we are seeing the real threat to Israel's future.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli Stop shouting, start talking

The new government's actions and proposals are not ideal, but not the apocalypse either, and reasoned discourse should produce acceptable solutions.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli 2023 could be a tough diplomatic year for Israel

The war in Ukraine and growing unrest in Iran pose challenges for Israel but the biggest problem will be if Netanyahu is unable to restrain his right-wing coalition partners.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli A tale of two elections

Both elections will seriously affect the future trajectory of Israel and the US, as well as their relations with each other.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli How to stop Israel's endless elections

Restoring stability to Israel's political system requires a couple of fundamental reforms.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli Is the Lebanon deal wonderful or terrible?

Israel's maritime border agreement with Lebanon has met with extravagant praise and vituperative condemnation, but neither side is right.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli In the new year, Israel's problems are mainly at home

The regional outlook is better than for some time, and internationally Israel is well positioned. The dangers lie in social divisions and political dysfunction.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli The PA: Time for Israeli intervention

With Iran's proxies threatening to take over the West Bank, Israel must act swiftly to replace failing Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli Going soft on the regime likeliest to use nukes

Only one country has serious thoughts of triggering Armageddon, and it isn't Russia or China.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli Reform the Israel Police

A string of recent incidents shows how ill-adapted Israel Police is to its task. It must change before things get out of hand.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli Israel needs a constitution now

The current lack of accountability on the part of our politicians is putting the country's very survival at stake.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli Give the people's wealth to the people

Israel's sovereign wealth fund, finally activated, should be used to narrow the country's shockingly wide economic gaps.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli Israel Police clobbers public diplomacy

Israel has recently found effective PR responses to its enemies, but the reality of heavy-handed policing is undermining them.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli Genocide is a word not to be used lightly

The Russian invasion of Ukraine is a crime under international law and atrocities have been committed, but the Russians are not trying to annihilate the Ukrainian people.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli Will Israel's Arabs use their new-found power wisely?

If they do, it could well be to Israel's wider benefit.

Norman Bailey  illustration: Gil Gibli Ukraine: Gains for China, worries for Israel

Russia's invasion of Ukraine looks like another chapter in the rise of China and the waning of the US. As for Israel, its interests do not justify its ambivalence.

Twitter Facebook Linkedin RSS Newsletters גלובס Israel Business Conference 2018